W
Wolfeymole
Which is the better road to travel?
Comments on a postcard please.
Comments on a postcard please.
Free PC Help is a community that offers free computer help and support for all users, all ages, worldwide.
In order to start asking questions or contribute on someone else's post you will first need to register. Don't worry - it's quick and easy and once you have registered you will have instant access to the entire forum.
If you do decide to join the forums you will not have the option to send Private Messages [ PMs ] or add a Signature until you have made 5 posts or more. This is an attempt to try to stop Spammers using the PM system or adding links to their Signature.
I'd say Buy (but preferably not from PC World) as quite a lot of people just do not have the knowledge or time to build one themselves.
I would say that both are viable depending on what you want, and how you see PC's.
Building a PC - you can class it as a project, a learning exercise, fun, and you get what you want - well mostly anyway.
It is likely to cost you more in parts and postage, your warranty is limited, and if you get in to trouble it can cost you more money to get it sorted.
Buying a prebuilt PC - mostly, they just work, the price is competitive, and they do everything 80% consumers want them to do. For those people, they are a tool, not a toy.
I've built them commercially for about 4 years and have this year scaled it down - the margins are now very low, and in reality there are very few systems that are rubbish - ever had a look inside a Medion or an Iqon - all branded parts, just like you and I buy. Dealing with the odd warranty soon depletes the profit margin. Now, if customers require new systems, I'll buy in Fujitsu's, Dell's or Acer's and sell them on. They are quiet, reliable and look ok, especially Dell's - they are great in a small office.
One off build's, media systems, and gaming systems are a different beast entirely. The big boys dont' cater so well for gaming and media, so I think building is a very viable option. Also, I guess a large number of gamers and media enthusiasts are into the technology and are wanting dabble in building, or even go into business! Investing time and money is part of it.
Is a built up PC better quality than a shop bought unit - No, not neccessarily.
Most systems I come across are well built for their purpose, and most customer failures are hard drives, with the odd board or PSU fault. Granted, their PSU's are right on the mark with their capacity, some are down on memory (especially early Vista units), but apart from that they need a clean out now and then. The exceptions - dont' know why but Packard Bell and eMachines seem to break more reguarly. Expected PC life I think is about 3 years - most get there easily. Then there''s the software - most bought units now have a comprehensive software package which includes burning software, recovery software and some with BIOS diagnostics.
It is easy to poke fun at the likes of Dell or HP, for some of their marketing practices - eg Dell PSU wiring tricks, but in reality most of their systems just do not fail and perform very well during their life - go on....go and buy one
Self built systems can be specced to be future proof, you can choose that passive cooling graphics card you need, more efficient cooler for overclocking etc - you can customise and build just what you want. I have to say it does take more than a couple of hours start to finish for a casual builder.
Consumer/business - better off with branded built systems.
Enthusiast - most definitely....build it.
Phew, that's me done
You have very little support on a self built.
BTW - those Dell's on a trolley you refer to - it's probably the same two backwards and forwards - just gives IT something to do